Driver Worldwide: Accidents trapped in India by live camera

Accidents trapped in India by live camera

More comments on the Fotokonvult

Parking accidents

Parking accidents do not play a minor role in practice. If you know the legal situation, the grows at the drive of a supermarket car park a queasy feeling. Sufferers of such parking incidents are often both parties, because the courts frequently carry out a damage apportionment.In its judgment of 15.12.2015 on file VI ZR 6/15, the Federal Court of Justice has adopted a principle decision on the application of the prima facie evidence in the case of parking accidents. The verdict was based on an accident constellation, in which two motor vehicles travel backwards out of the parking bay of a private but publicly accessible parking lot, for example a supermarket, and collide with one another. In this case, for example, the vehicle A travels laterally into the vehicle B and it can not be excluded that B was already standing at the time of the collision. According to a widespread view, in these cases an equally high responsibility was assumed, ie a liability distribution 50/50 was assumed. The reason for this was the assumption by way of a prima facie evidence that both parties involved in the event of a reversal were in breach of their due diligence obligations under Section 9 (5) of the Road Traffic Regulations.The verdict was misinterpreted in the media. This applies both to the allegedly earlier legal situation, according to which, in such constellations, each had to bear its own damage as well as the new legal situation, which is allegedly to replace one of the parties in full. Neither had the accidents involved suffered their own damage in the past, nor does the BGH's judgment imply the full liability of any of the parties involved. A legal consequence, according to which in such cases everyone must bear his own damage is foreign to German law. Rather, it was the case that each of the insurers could claim 50% of their own damages. Surprisingly, the false assumption that everyone must bear their own damage has been stubbornly persistent for many years, as stubborn as perception, and the distribution of liability between the accident victims would be the responsibility of the insurers. In these cases, the insurers do not interfere with each other at all.The BGH does not impose a liability rate. The main issue is the question of whether a prima facie evidence is applied against the person who may already have been. The BGH denies this.In any case, if one reads the aforementioned judgment of the Federal Court of Justice to the end, it becomes clear that a full liability of one of the accident participants is possible, but not precisely. After the decision, in the future, at least one predominant liability of the person who has entered the other passenger car will usually be accepted - if it can not be ruled out that he already existed. The Federal Court of Justice dismissed the case to the Court of Appeals, stating the following:"In the case of further proceedings, the Senate points out that, even if the proof of the first appearance is not a fault on the part of the plaintiff, the operational risk of his vehicle and other circumstances which can be inferred by a fault of the originally returning trader , May be taken into account in the context of the weighing-up. "(BGH, judgment of 15 December 2015 - VI ZR 6/15, paragraph 16, juris)There remains a great deal of scope for determining the liability distribution. A liability ratio of 75/25 can be considered probable.

No comments:

LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICE OF MOTOR VEHICLES

DEFINITION
An accident judgment is the final action resulting from a suit filed in a court of law. A judgment may be rendered in any court of law, including judicial court, municipal court, district court and the justice of the peace court, and will be processed by this Department provided all requirements for acceptability are met.

REQUIREMENTS

Certified copy of the judgment. If the judgement is not certified, it must be signed by a representative of the court.
Clerk's certificate stating the judgment is final and no suspensive appeal has been taken.
If the claim amount is over, $25,000, a breakdown of the property and medical damages must be included.

METHODS OF COMPLIANCE

Proof of insurance covering the date of accident; or
Acceptable installment agreement; or
Final court Judgment or release indicating owner/driver is free from liability arising from the accident; or
Evidence from the court that more than 10 years has lapsed and the Judgment has not been re-inscribed; or
Acceptable bankruptcy documents

SR-22 REQUIREMENTS

Proof of Financial Responsibility (SR-22) is required when an installment agreement is filed and until three years after the date of release from the judgment
SR-22 is not required if the judgment was paid off within 60 days of the judgment date
Official notices issued prior to July 1, 1992 are not required to carry SR-22 for 3 years from the date of judgment rendered.

Italian woman charged over motorbike hit

An Italian woman has been charged with dangerous driving causing grievous bodily harm after a female motorcyclist was critically injured in a crash on the NSW's north coast.

The crash happened around 1.45pm on Friday at Shelly Beach, East Ballina.

The 47-year-old motorcycle rider was taken to Gold Coast Hospital in a critical condition with numerous serious injuries after a collision with a van.

The driver of the van, a 29-year-old woman from Italy, was not injured but has been charged with dangerous driving and negligent driving occasioning grievous bodily harm.

She was granted conditional bail to appear at Ballina Local Court on February 9.

Yearly snapshot

A total of 35,092 people died in motor vehicle crashes in 2015. The U.S. Department of Transportation's most recent estimate of the annual economic cost of crashes was $242 billion dollars. 1 Contributing to the death toll are alcohol, speeding, lack of safety belt use and other problematic driver behaviors. Death rates vary by vehicle type, driver age and gender, and other factors.

In 1975, the U.S. Department of Transportation started an annual census of motor vehicle deaths, recording information on crash type, vehicle type, road type, driver characteristics and a variety of other factors. Institute researchers analyze these data each year to quantify the public health problem of motor vehicle deaths.

List of motor vehicle deaths in U.S. by year

The table below is a list of motor vehicle deaths in the United States by year. On average in 2012, 92 people were killed on the roadways of the U.S. each day, in 30,800 fatal crashes during the year.^[1]

The number of deaths – and deaths relative to the total population – has declined over the last two decades. From 1979 to 2005, the number of deaths per year decreased 14.97% while the number of deaths per capita decreased by 35.46%. In 2010, there were an estimated 5,419,000 crashes (30,296 fatal crashes), killing 32,999 and injuring 2,239,000.^[2] The 32,479 traffic fatalities in 2011 were the lowest in 62 years (1949). Records indicate that there has been a total of 3,613,732 motor vehicle fatalities in the United States from 1899 to 2013.